Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Fordham Should Prescribe Birth Control

EXECUTIVE EDITOR

Published: Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Updated: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 15:02


Let's talk about sex.

It is not a conversation that happens often on our campus. Our reluctance to do so, however, recently landed Fordham on College Magazine's list of the most prudish universities.

Add to that conservative attitude Fordham's strict guidelines concerning birth control and contraceptives, in line with most Catholic institutions, and you have a culture where discussions about sexuality and sexual health are taboo.

According to the Student Health Services website, "as an institution in the Catholic, Jesuit tradition, Fordham University follows church teachings on reproductive issues."

The Catholic Church, of course, considers it immoral to prevent conception by any artificial means, including condoms, birth control pills and IUDs.

Not all students attending Fordham, however, realize at first how Catholic tenets reflect on Fordham's policies regarding women's health.

"I'm not Catholic, so I didn't connect the two things," Elizabeth Bolen, FCRH '14, said. "I just assumed that every college does [provide contraceptives]."

"I transferred from a different school in Baltimore, where we could get condoms whenever we needed them, and I already had a [birth control] prescription and everything," Stella Jendrzejewski, FCRH '13, said. "So I didn't even worry about [Fordham's policy when I started] here."

It is hard to place the blame on students for not understanding Fordham's policy, since the full explanation is essentially hidden on the University's website.

One organization, Fordham Law Students for Reproductive Justice (FLSRJ), has been pushing for a clarification of Fordham's birth control policy.

"When there's a policy that effects 50 percent of the students that attend the University, we just want to make sure that that information is clear and available to students so there's no misconceptions," Emily Wolf, Fordham Law '13 and vice president of FLSRJ, said.

Online, one has to visit the Women's Health Care tab on the Student Health Services site to find an explicit statement on the policy. It is the only page that states the following:

"Neither contraceptives nor birth control are distributed or prescribed on premises as a standard practice."

"We prescribe birth control pills to students with specific medical reasons such as PCOS, acne, etc. with official documentation from doctors or through examination at [the] health center. Reasons other than contraceptive purposes," Kathleen M. Malara, director of Student Health Services, said.

Due to new government mandates about contraceptives, however, that policy may have to be expanded.

Last July, the nonpartisan Institute of Medicine, which had been reviewing the specifications of the Affordable Care Act (otherwise known as Obamacare) issued a report saying that birth control is a preventive medicine and should be free for all women.

By the first of August, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a ruling requiring that insurance companies cover women's preventive services without co-pays or deductibles.

In addition to FDA-approved forms of birth control (and yes, that includes the morning-after pill), these preventive services include well-woman screenings, gestinal diabetes screenings, breast-feeding support and domestic violence screenings.

The biggest complication with the mandate, which was praised by most healthcare professionals, was the obvious contradiction with religious beliefs against contraception.

On Jan. 20, the HHS offered its solution: Religiously affiliated hospitals and schools have until Aug. 1, 2013 to provide the required healthcare plans covering contraceptives. (Churches and other houses of worship, however, are exempt.)

The response from the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops was swift and overwhelmingly negative.

"To force American citizens to choose between violating their consciences and forging healthcare is literally unconscionable," Cardinal-designate Timothy M. Dolan, archbishop of New York, said in a statement.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

1 comments Log in to Comment

Mel86
Fri Feb 10 2012 01:25
In 1982 I was a freshman at Fordham College. When I went to the health services center on campus for a common "female-related" health matter and contraception consultation, I was told such care wasn't available. I was advised to visit a women's health clinic off Decator Road and was provided with the address.

I don't know what the neighborhood surrounding Fordham is like today, but back then wandering around Bronx side streets wasn't necessary the safest outing for a 17-year-old girl from the suburbs. Before leaving campus for the clinic I told my roommate where I was going, figuring someone should know my whereabouts. I walked to and from the clinic alone. After I graduated from Fordham and met people who had attended other colleges, I learned that the university's policy toward women's health was not the norm for a campus health center.

I think back on that experience and am still angry that Fordham risked my safety rather than provide me and other female students with preventive health care and basic gyn services.

To this day, I am angry that church dogma took precedence over my health and safety and that of other female students.

To this day, I am angry that - in the midst of the AIDS crisis - Fordham denied sexual health care and education to its student body.

(By the way, I need two hands to count the number of male classmates who came out of the closet a few years after we left college. Because these young men had to hide their sexual orientation at Rose Hill, they essentially lived double lives by juggling girlfriends on-campus and gay encounters in Manhattan, a subway- or Ram van-ride away. Condoms to prevent pregnancy may be all that protected several FC'86 women from exposure to HIV.)

In 1985, I was the editor-in-chief of The Ram. Following in the tradition of editorial boards before me, I published the freshman orientation issue, which included several articles with resources for finding help and information about alcohol and drug use and abuse (both prevalent at Fordham); sexuality, STDs and birth control; personal safety, etc. I was asked by the university to remove those articles. I left them in. I understand that a few years later the newspaper did cease publishing those resource pages.
The recent New York Times article about Fordham law students advocating for reproductive health care and this Ram article tell me that little has changed at Fordham in 25 years. (Yikes, how did I get so old?)

In retrospect, as a non-Catholic, I probably shouldn't have selected Fordham as my undergraduate college. But when I enrolled my family and I believed that Fordham was a private college "in the Jesuit tradition," but not a Catholic college, per se. The school's continued policies about sexual health care clearly show we were wrong, but really, even Fordham students have premarital sex, and other than for perhaps Mr. and Mrs. Rick Santorum, nearly all sexually active Catholics use and rely on birth control.
To be fair, I will say that, overall, I had a positive experience at Fordham. My Fordham internships directly helped me establish my editorial career, and the school's sexist and shortsighted health policies helped inspire me to pursue a graduate degree in public health and do what I can to support access to reproductive health care. On top of all that, I met my husband at Fordham.

But because of the second-class treatment of young women at Fordham, other than for a few specific occasions, we don't make donations to Fordham - and we don't want our son and two daughters to attend our alma mater.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In